Living under Trump 2 aka Musk!!!

Feel free to discuss debate news, current events, and other entertaining topics here. Civility is a requirement.
User avatar
The Evil Genius
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2025 4:03 pm
Reactions score: 108
Location: Gallifery


I bet you that he thinks they are Dutch too. 😆
88Commanders00
Posts: 583
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2024 12:44 am
Reactions score: 222
Location: Palm Bay, Florida
The Evil Genius wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2025 4:05 pm
People are in the FO stage early.

Stop whining, you voted for it.

My maga classmate from junior high is waiting for Trump to aid WV because of recent rain; in between snow.
FKA Rdskns2000/88Comrade00
Simmsy
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2024 4:34 am
Reactions score: 96
Sarge wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2025 6:46 pm
More done in a month than Jotato did in four years

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... hours.html

Zelensky surrenders to Trump and 'will sign mineral deal within hours'
Yeah, because its extortion. No one will ever deal with us again, thats probably for the best. America's influence evaporates by the day.

Edit: In fact, what did Trump accomplish that Biden didn't on this front? Whatever, no more troll feeding.
Last edited by Simmsy on Fri Feb 21, 2025 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sarge
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:43 pm
Reactions score: 8
Simmsy wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2025 6:59 pm
Sarge wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2025 6:46 pm
More done in a month than Jotato did in four years

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... hours.html

Zelensky surrenders to Trump and 'will sign mineral deal within hours'
Yeah, because its extortion. No one will ever deal with us again, thats probably for the best. America's influence evaporates by the day.
I consider it payment for the billions we sent, 100 billion of which can't be accounted for. Trump has already spoken of loans in the future, instead of free money. Sound policy for a country that's 36 billion in debt.
BraveLilToasterOven
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:12 pm
Reactions score: 31
Sarge wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2025 5:43 pm
And yet just two days ago Trump said in a press interview SS wasn't going to be touched, and it's the program that needs it most
He also said he didn't know the Project 2025 creators from the Heritage Foundation but yet they're all in his administration now and he's been crossing off Project 2025 objectives since day 1. Maybe he's a senile, lying piece of shit?

Image
Last edited by BraveLilToasterOven on Sat Feb 22, 2025 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
aka Barry.Randolphe
BraveLilToasterOven
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:12 pm
Reactions score: 31
Sarge wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2025 7:07 pm
I consider it payment for the billions we sent, 100 billion of which can't be accounted for. Trump has already spoken of loans in the future, instead of free money. Sound policy for a country that's 36 billion in debt.
You keep repeating this. No clue what you're talking about or what NewsMax has their followers frothing at the mouth about now with pro-Russian propaganda.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/where-mis ... id-ukraine
As CSIS has reported before, “aid to Ukraine” is a misnomer because 90 percent of military aid is spent in the United States. Of aid overall, 60 percent is spent in the United States, about 25 percent is spent in Ukraine, and the final 15 percent is spent globally.
Q3: So, what happened to the “missing” $100 billion?

A3: The short answer is that it is not missing. The funds went (mostly) to activities that arose because of the war, and all are accounted for. Some paid for sending equipment and funds directly to Ukraine. A large part went to activities that arose because of the war but were not spent in Ukraine. To see why this is the case, it is important to look at the funding as a whole.
I have to question your username 'Sarge' since you clearly don't understand how the money/aid we've given Ukraine effects the US economy. The aid we've given them is being spent on American made equipment and it is keeping our factories busy producing equipment in places like Ohio, Texas, Alabama, etc.

Besides that, weakening Russia by having them focus all their resources on this stupid war is paying dividends to us. They can barely do anything against a ragtag Ukrainian army - it has shown they are paper tigers and it has forced their partners (e.g. Iran/China/North Korea) to reassess their equipment they've purchased from Russia because it is shit. No one is buying their new Su-57 because it is pure shit and not a 5th gen aircraft.
aka Barry.Randolphe
China
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:47 am
Reactions score: 111
AP sues Trump administration officials after being blocked from presidential events

The Associated Press is suing three Trump administration officials in federal court for banning AP reporters from some of President Trump’s events, the Oval Office, and Air Force One.

The AP alleges that the ban violates the First Amendment as well as the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.

The suit was filed Friday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Washington. The AP is seeking an emergency hearing and a court order to declare the ban unconstitutional and require them to rescind it. The judge assigned to the case is Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee. The Trump administration did not respond to a request for comment.

Earlier this month, the AP, one of the world’s largest news outlets, was singled out by the White House for continuing to use the phrase “Gulf of Mexico” even though Trump renamed the body of water “Gulf of America.”

“The Associated Press just refuses to go with what the law is and what has taken place, it’s called the ‘Gulf of America’ now,” Trump said at a press conference earlier this week – an event The AP was not allowed to attend.

Other countries do not recognize the new name, and the AP is a global news outlet with customers all around the world, so its stories – and influential stylebook – are still referring to the “Gulf of Mexico” while also acknowledging Trump’s decree.

AP’s legal filing summarized the matter this way: The White House has ordered its journalists “to use certain words in its coverage or else face an indefinite denial of access.”

“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the AP’s lawyers wrote in the news organization’s complaint. “The Constitution does not allow the government to control speech. Allowing such government control and retaliation to stand is a threat to every American’s freedom.”

The ban was first implemented on February 11. Top AP editors immediately described it as a First Amendment violation but tried to resolve the dispute behind the scenes before resorting to legal action.

On Friday, the AP indicated that it is suing in part to protect other news outlets from similar punishment by the Trump White House.

Click on the link for the full article
Image
Jumbo
Site Admin
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 11:21 am
Reactions score: 236
https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/21/politics ... index.html

The boogey man of the DEI concept.

Let socially stunted 17 year old incel tech prodigies lead in personnel management for the Pentagon! 😛

wimmens and negroes go first! 🤡
It ain't what you don't know that's a problem. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.~~~Mark Twain
Sarge
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:43 pm
Reactions score: 8
China wrote: Sat Feb 22, 2025 12:02 am
AP sues Trump administration officials after being blocked from presidential events

The Associated Press is suing three Trump administration officials in federal court for banning AP reporters from some of President Trump’s events, the Oval Office, and Air Force One.

The AP alleges that the ban violates the First Amendment as well as the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.

The suit was filed Friday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Washington. The AP is seeking an emergency hearing and a court order to declare the ban unconstitutional and require them to rescind it. The judge assigned to the case is Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee. The Trump administration did not respond to a request for comment.

Earlier this month, the AP, one of the world’s largest news outlets, was singled out by the White House for continuing to use the phrase “Gulf of Mexico” even though Trump renamed the body of water “Gulf of America.”

“The Associated Press just refuses to go with what the law is and what has taken place, it’s called the ‘Gulf of America’ now,” Trump said at a press conference earlier this week – an event The AP was not allowed to attend.

Other countries do not recognize the new name, and the AP is a global news outlet with customers all around the world, so its stories – and influential stylebook – are still referring to the “Gulf of Mexico” while also acknowledging Trump’s decree.

AP’s legal filing summarized the matter this way: The White House has ordered its journalists “to use certain words in its coverage or else face an indefinite denial of access.”

“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the AP’s lawyers wrote in the news organization’s complaint. “The Constitution does not allow the government to control speech. Allowing such government control and retaliation to stand is a threat to every American’s freedom.”

The ban was first implemented on February 11. Top AP editors immediately described it as a First Amendment violation but tried to resolve the dispute behind the scenes before resorting to legal action.

On Friday, the AP indicated that it is suing in part to protect other news outlets from similar punishment by the Trump White House.

Click on the link for the full article
Is it written anywhere that trump even has to talk to the press? Hell, he talked to them more on the first day than Jotato did his whole four years. And after the way they blasted the "russian colluuuuuuuuuuuuusion" bullshit 24/7, I wouldn't even speak to them at all.
Sarge
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 3:43 pm
Reactions score: 8
Jumbo wrote: Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:40 am
https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/21/politics ... index.html

The boogey man of the DEI concept.

Let socially stunted 17 year old incel tech prodigies lead in personnel management for the Pentagon! 😛

wimmens and negroes go first! 🤡
Getting back to the warrior mindset, instead of catering to confused men. I know this upsets liberals.
Post Reply